ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
William D. Rowe, William F. Holcomb
Nuclear Technology | Volume 24 | Number 3 | December 1974 | Pages 286-293
Technical Paper | Radioactive Waste | doi.org/10.13182/NT74-A31488
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
One of the critical factors that must be considered in the decision-making process required in solving the radioactive waste management problem is the issue of costs. The accumulation of both government- and commercially generated wastes is estimated at some 200 million gal of high-level waste, 400 million ft3 of low-level waste, and 85 million ft3 of alpha wastes by the year 2000. Cost projections are made for high-level waste management (exclusive of ultimate disposal), for low-level waste burial, and for alpha waste burial. These cost estimates indicate some $7 billion to be committed for waste management by the year 2000. In addition, the cost for ultimate disposal of high-level wastes could exceed $1 billion by the year 2000, depending on the government surcharge for handling these wastes. Therefore, explicit attention should be given to the possibility that an interim engineered storage system may become permanent solely due to economic costs.