ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
M. H. Fontana, R. E. MacPherson, P. A. Gnadt, L. F. Parsly, J. L. Wantland
Nuclear Technology | Volume 24 | Number 2 | November 1974 | Pages 176-200
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT74-A31474
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experiments were performed with a 19-rod test assembly in the fuel failure mockup sodium loop in which fuel rods were simulated by electrical cartridge heaters having the same external configuration, spacer arrangement, temperature, and heat flux as those of a typical liquid-metal fast breeder reactor (LMFBR). Temperatures were measured within the rod bundle, at the exit, and along the duct walls of the rod assembly for widely varying conditions of flow and power density and for nonuniform radial power distribution. Significant differences in temperature were measured around the duct periphery. These appeared to be linearly dependent on the power density. Flow reduction caused a decrease in these measured temperature differences. Temperatures at the exit of interior subchannels agreed with analytical predictions. Those of peripheral channels, however, indicated the existence of significant swirl flow around the rod bundle and required a separate analytical treatment. In situ radiographs indicated distortion of the rod bundle toward the duct wall at elevations where the spiral wire-wrap spacers did not touch the duct wall. At each elevation, the measured circumferential temperature profile was related to the position of the wire-wrap spacers relative to the duct wall. Higher temperatures were measured on duct walls not in contact with the spacers. The measured differences in temperature around the duct periphery were of sufficient magnitude that, if present in LMFBR cores, their effect should be considered in evaluating temperature-dependent material growth due to fast-neutron irradiation.