ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
CLEAN SMART bill reintroduced in Senate
Senators Ben Ray Luján (D., N.M.) and Tim Scott (R., S.C.) have reintroduced legislation aimed at leveraging the best available science and technology at U.S. national laboratories to support the cleanup of legacy nuclear waste.
The Combining Laboratory Expertise to Accelerate Novel Solutions for Minimizing Accumulated Radioactive Toxins (CLEAN SMART) Act, introduced on February 11, would authorize up to $58 million annually to develop, demonstrate, and deploy innovative technologies, targeting reduced costs and safer, faster remediation of sites from the Manhattan Project and Cold War.
R. B. Fitts, F. L. Miller
Nuclear Technology | Volume 21 | Number 1 | January 1974 | Pages 26-38
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT74-A31377
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Three irradiation tests were conducted in the Oak Ridge Research Reactor to evaluate and compare the low-burnup (0.5% FIMA) performance of Sphere-Pac and pellet fuels. The stainless-steel-clad (U, Pu)O2 fuel pins were fabricated at a smear density of 82% of theoretical and irradiated in a fully instrumented capsule. The capsule position was varied to control fission heating, and the fuel center temperatures, cladding temperatures, and heat generation rates were measured. The data from these tests showed, at the 99% confidence level, that the thermal conductance of the Sphere-Pac fuel pin was 11.7 ±1.2% better than that of the pellet fuel pin. This result was attributed to better heat transfer across the fuel-cladding interface with the Sphere-Pac fuel form. In addition, the Sphere-Pac fuel was more compatible with cladding than the pellet fuel, even though the maximum cladding temperature was higher on the Sphere-Pac fuel pin. Both fuel types restructured thermally at the same temperatures.