ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
New coolants, new fuels: A new generation of university reactors
Here’s an easy way to make aging U.S. power reactors look relatively youthful: Compare them (average age: 43) with the nation’s university research reactors. The 25 operating today have been licensed for an average of about 58 years.
R. B. Fitts, F. L. Miller
Nuclear Technology | Volume 21 | Number 1 | January 1974 | Pages 26-38
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT74-A31377
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Three irradiation tests were conducted in the Oak Ridge Research Reactor to evaluate and compare the low-burnup (0.5% FIMA) performance of Sphere-Pac and pellet fuels. The stainless-steel-clad (U, Pu)O2 fuel pins were fabricated at a smear density of 82% of theoretical and irradiated in a fully instrumented capsule. The capsule position was varied to control fission heating, and the fuel center temperatures, cladding temperatures, and heat generation rates were measured. The data from these tests showed, at the 99% confidence level, that the thermal conductance of the Sphere-Pac fuel pin was 11.7 ±1.2% better than that of the pellet fuel pin. This result was attributed to better heat transfer across the fuel-cladding interface with the Sphere-Pac fuel form. In addition, the Sphere-Pac fuel was more compatible with cladding than the pellet fuel, even though the maximum cladding temperature was higher on the Sphere-Pac fuel pin. Both fuel types restructured thermally at the same temperatures.