ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
ANS, UCOR sign MOU for workforce development program
The American Nuclear Society and United Cleanup Oak Ridge have signed a memorandum of understanding that establishes a framework for collaboration to advance ANS workforce training and certification programs serving the nuclear industry.
According to the document, UCOR will provide “operational insights and subject matter expertise to inform ANS’s professional development and credentialing offerings, including the Certified Nuclear Professional [CNP] program.” The collaboration will strengthen UCOR’s workforce development efforts while advancing ANS’s mission to sustain and expand the national nuclear workforce pipeline and capabilities.
R. B. Fitts, F. L. Miller
Nuclear Technology | Volume 21 | Number 1 | January 1974 | Pages 26-38
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT74-A31377
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Three irradiation tests were conducted in the Oak Ridge Research Reactor to evaluate and compare the low-burnup (0.5% FIMA) performance of Sphere-Pac and pellet fuels. The stainless-steel-clad (U, Pu)O2 fuel pins were fabricated at a smear density of 82% of theoretical and irradiated in a fully instrumented capsule. The capsule position was varied to control fission heating, and the fuel center temperatures, cladding temperatures, and heat generation rates were measured. The data from these tests showed, at the 99% confidence level, that the thermal conductance of the Sphere-Pac fuel pin was 11.7 ±1.2% better than that of the pellet fuel pin. This result was attributed to better heat transfer across the fuel-cladding interface with the Sphere-Pac fuel form. In addition, the Sphere-Pac fuel was more compatible with cladding than the pellet fuel, even though the maximum cladding temperature was higher on the Sphere-Pac fuel pin. Both fuel types restructured thermally at the same temperatures.