ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Launching into tomorrow: NRIC guides new era of research and deployment
In June 2025, the Department of Energy announced the Reactor Pilot Program, an authorization pathway that allowed reactor developers to partner with the DOE to get first-of-a-kind (FOAK) reactors built and tested. Soon after, the DOE rolled out a complementary Fuel Line Pilot Program, which aimed to fast-track fuel projects. In all, 20 projects were accepted into the new programs.
Stephen A. McGuire, José G. Martín
Nuclear Technology | Volume 18 | Number 3 | June 1973 | Pages 257-266
Technical Paper | Economic | doi.org/10.13182/NT73-A31299
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the past, the electric utility companies have been able to ignore inflation rates of ∼1.6%/yr in their planning because technological improvements managed to maintain a gap of ∼1% between the rates of increase of the consumer price index and the cost of electricity. This stability in the price of electricity is not likely to continue; for the years 1968 through 1971 the inflation rate averaged 5.0%/yr, the cost of petroleum rose 3.2%/yr, and the cost of coal increased by 16.0%/yr, causing large increases in utility costs. Drawing from conventional economics and the experience of other countries with a long history of inflation, the present paper shows the effect of expected fuel, operation, and maintenance cost escalation on the price of electricity and on the relative competitiveness of nuclear and fossil-fuel plants. A self-consistent mode of cost computation using a “monetary correction” to account for inflation shows that, in relation to fossil-fuel electric power, nuclear power is ∼15% more economical than most conventional comparisons indicate. The implications are important for the establishment of a national energy policy and have repercussions in other capital-intensive schemes.