ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
C. L. Brown, L. C. Davenport, D. R Oden
Nuclear Technology | Volume 18 | Number 2 | May 1973 | Pages 109-114
Technical Paper | A Review of Plutonium Utilization in Thermal Reactors / Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT73-A31282
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The nuclear criticality safety aspects of light water reactor (Pu,U)O2 fuel fabrication have been reviewed. Conclusions are as follows: 1. Criticality safety limitations will present a major design challenge in those parts of the plant where plutonium and plutonium-uranium solutions are processed. In particular, the requirement of large vessel volume to achieve homogeneous plutonium-uranium blending will be complicated by the restrictive criticality safety limits necessary on vessel dimensions. Special vessel design, such as annular geometry, and fixed nuclear poisons are possible innovations to overcome this problem. 2. Once the PuO2 and UO2 are mixed and in dry powder form, plant throughput should proceed at a reasonable rate and criticality safety will not necessarily limit operations. 3. In dry operations, radiation protection limitations are likely to be more restrictive than criticality safety limitations. In other words, criticality safety limits will not be determining factors for process control, since the fuel will be well confined in glove boxes and handled in relatively small batches for radiation protection considerations. 4. The fact that plutonium recycle fuel will be fabricated in sealed glove boxes will make it more feasible to base criticality safety on limits for unmoderated fuel, in certain parts of the plant, than is now possible in UO2 fuel fabrication plants. 5. The basic critical masses and dimensions applicable to the fabrication of plutonium recycle fuel are expected to be only slightly more restrictive than those for light water reactor UO2 fuel.