ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
G. E. Russcher, A. L. Pitner
Nuclear Technology | Volume 16 | Number 1 | October 1972 | Pages 208-215
Technical Paper | Reactor Materials Performance / Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT72-A31187
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Thirty-five sets of thermal reactor data were analyzed mathematically to derive a best fit function to predict gas release from boron carbide as a function of temperature, irradiation exposure, and material density. An exposure variable to account for difference in self-shielding in various reactor spectra was developed. The data used in the analysis included temperatures from 550 to 1200°F, irradiation exposures from 10 × 1020 to 31 × 1020 captures/g, and material densities of 2.0 and 2.5 g/cm3 (80 and 99% of the theoretical density). Within this range the function should predict gas release in all reactor spectra within the 20% estimated accuracy of the experimental data. Independent gas release data generated in fast and intermediate reactor spectra showed that the general form of the function is correct but that application to temperature conditions above the specified range may result in overestimates of gas release.