ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
CLEAN SMART bill reintroduced in Senate
Senators Ben Ray Luján (D., N.M.) and Tim Scott (R., S.C.) have reintroduced legislation aimed at leveraging the best available science and technology at U.S. national laboratories to support the cleanup of legacy nuclear waste.
The Combining Laboratory Expertise to Accelerate Novel Solutions for Minimizing Accumulated Radioactive Toxins (CLEAN SMART) Act, introduced on February 11, would authorize up to $58 million annually to develop, demonstrate, and deploy innovative technologies, targeting reduced costs and safer, faster remediation of sites from the Manhattan Project and Cold War.
Harry J. Otway, Ronald K. Lohrding, Morris E. Battat
Nuclear Technology | Volume 12 | Number 2 | October 1971 | Pages 173-184
Technical Paper | Reactor Siting | doi.org/10.13182/NT71-A31025
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method for estimating the risk from reactor installations is presented and applied to the Omega West Reactor, an 8-MW(th) research reactor at Los Alamos, New Mexico. The method, which considers both accident probabilities and the probability of various wind and weather conditions, estimates individual risk as a function of direction and distance from the reactor and estimates the total detriment to the community as a consequence of reactor accidents. The somatic risk due to thyroid carcinoma from 131I uptake, the somatic risks of leukemia and other neoplasms from whole body irradiation, the genetic risk, and nonspecific life shortening were considered. The individual somatic risk at the nearest habitation was found to be 5 × 10−10/year and the total detriment to the community (all the above risks summed over the total population) was 4.5 × 10−4 death per year of reactor operation.