ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
April 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Diablo Canyon advocacy, Midwest nuclear legislation among April state news items
Pending, passed, and coveted legislation involving nuclear energy made their way across multiple state capitol buildings in the month of April. Here are a few notable updates from California, Iowa, Kentucky, and Missouri.
Reino Ekholm
Nuclear Technology | Volume 10 | Number 3 | March 1971 | Pages 249-256
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT71-A30957
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An assessment of the relative merits of heliumsodiumand steam-cooled fast breeders was completed in Sweden in 1969. Breeders have the potential of reducing overall system power costs provided no more than 40 million tons of uranium can be mined below $15/lb U3O8. The breeders—particularly those cooled by Na or Heset reasonable upper limits to mining and enrichment capacity requirements. Fuel development is the outstanding problem for these breeders, and especially difficult for the steam-cooled type. Steam cooling shows the lowest capital costs, followed by helium cooling, and is relatively promising with low-cost uranium. Sodium cooling involves the most extensive research and development (R&D) program; the helium- and steam-cooled breeders are largely based on thermal-reactor technology and offer real potential as advanced next-generation plants. However, the uncertainties, even of the relative assessments, still overlap the estimated power cost differences of 0.4 mill/kWh.