ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
C. M. Walter, P. G. Shewmon, J. P. Bacca
Nuclear Technology | Volume 11 | Number 1 | May 1971 | Pages 38-44
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT71-A30900
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A metallic fuel-element modeling code (BEMOD) has been developed to describe the irradiation behavior of EBR-II driver fuels. BEMOD has been applied to both the present Mark LA and the advanced Mark II driver fuels. Good agreement on cladding diameter changes as a function of burnup is obtained between calculations and measurements on irradiated fuel elements. At a reactor power of 50 MW(th), the code calculations indicate that the Mark IA element is capable of about 3.5 at.% before a cladding ΔD/D of 2% is expected, while the Mark II design should be capable of about twice that burnup before a similar cladding ΔD/D is attained. The increase in reactor power to 62.5 MW(th) appears to have no appreciable effect on the above values.