ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
D. J. Hill, W. D. Rankin
Nuclear Technology | Volume 11 | Number 2 | June 1971 | Pages 175-184
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT71-A30882
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Radiation data calculated by the discrete-ordinates technique is compared with experimentally determined information measured on the PAX intermediate spectrum reactor which is neu-tronically similar to the NERVA nuclear rocket. The information compared consists of the neutron dose rate, photon dose rate, fast neutron flux (measured with 238 U and sulfur detectors), and thermal neutron flux (measured with bare- and cadmium-covered dysprosium detectors) data in the core and reflector of the reactor. The calculated results displayed the same shape as the experimental data for all detectors and, with the exception of the bare dysprosium data in the core and the sulfur data, the calculated results had the same magnitude as the experimental results within the limits of experimental accuracies.