ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
B. K. Crowley, H. D. Glenn
Nuclear Technology | Volume 11 | Number 3 | July 1971 | Pages 372-378
Technical Paper | Nuclear Explosion Engineering / Nuclear Explosive | doi.org/10.13182/NT71-A30871
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Marvel experiment was conducted at the Nevada Test Site in a horizontal, air-filled tunnel 1 m in diameter and 122 m long, 176 m below the surface. A 2.2kt nuclear device was detonated at one end of the tunnel. The primary purpose of Marvel was to develop experimental and calculational techniques for understanding energy propagation in a nonspherical initial geometry. This paper briefly describes the Marvel experiment, some of the experimental techniques used, and agreement of the numerical calculations with the experimental data. The favorable comparison between experimental data and the calculations implies that the calculations can be used as a predictive technique for similar nonspherically emplaced experiments.