ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
J. O. Cermak, R. H. Leyse, D. P. Dominicis
Nuclear Technology | Volume 11 | Number 4 | August 1971 | Pages 557-562
Technical Paper | Symposium on Fuel Rod Failure and Its Effect / Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT71-A30853
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effects of flow blockage on bottom-cooling heat transfer effectiveness were studied in the PWR-FLECHT program. Blockages of 50 and 75% of the flow area of a 5 × 5 array in the center of a 7 × 7 rod bundle were studied with 12-ft-long heater rods with an axial cosine heat generation distribution of 1.66 peak-to-average and decay-heat simulation. The test section consists of 42 heated rods (fuel rods) and 7 non-heated tubes (control rod thimbles). Flow blockage is effected by a -in.-thick flat plate mounted at the peak heat generation location (6-ft elevation) with the heater rod thermocouples being located ∼1 in. downstream from the flow blockage plate. The results of a flooding rate of 6 in./sec showed the maximum temperature rise in the heater rod was the same for 0, 50, and 75% flow blockage. Lower flooding rates of 4- and 2-in./sec showed higher temperature rises in the heater rod for the 0% flow blockage case than for the 75% flow blockage case. These flow blockage tests demonstrate that bottom-flooding heat transfer effectiveness is not impaired with the flow blockage configurations tested. Further tests are planned at flow area blockages of 90%.