ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
Richard G. Bock, John D. Duncan, James E. Leonard
Nuclear Technology | Volume 11 | Number 4 | August 1971 | Pages 532-543
Technical Paper | Symposium on Fuel Rod Failure and Its Effect / Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT71-A30850
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The first full-length, electrically heated, 49-rod, Zircaloy-clad simulated BWR fuel bundle with internally pressurized rods was spray cooled under loss-of-coolant conditions. The heater rods were internally pressurized with argon to simulate fission product gas inventory. Many perforations and severe rod distortions occurred near the center of the bundle. Nevertheless, spray cooling, initiated at a maximum cladding temperature of 1920°F, was effective in limiting cladding temperatures to ≈2250°F. Electrical failure of 10 heater rods complicated interpretation of the results, and it is estimated that the maximum temperature would have been ≈2360°F had the failures not occurred. The maximum coolant flow area reduction around a single rod caused by local perforations was 50%. However, this flow area reduction did not appreciably impair the effectiveness of the spray cooling system. That is, analysis performed using current General Electric (GE) loss-of-coolant technique s and heat transfer coefficients derived from stainless-steel-clad bundle tests predicted the maximum cladding temperature to within 20°F.