ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NextEra, Dominion to merge in major utilities announcement
NextEra Energy is set to acquire Dominion Energy, the two utilities announced earlier today in an approximately $67 billion merger that will alter the energy landscape—including for nuclear power—in the United States.
Kwang Won Seul, Young Seok Bang, Hho Jung Kim
Nuclear Technology | Volume 126 | Number 3 | June 1999 | Pages 265-278
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT99-A2973
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The potential of the RELAP5/MOD3.2 code was assessed for a loss-of-residual-heat-removal (RHR) event during midloop operation, and the predictability of major thermal-hydraulic phenomena was evaluated for the long-term transient. The calculations were compared for two cases of experiments conducted at the Rig of Safety Assessment-IV (ROSA-IV)/Large-Scale Test Facility (LSTF) in Japan: the cold-leg-opening and the pressurizer-manway-opening cases. In addition, the real plant responses to the event were evaluated for Yong Gwang nuclear power plant Units 3 and 4 (YGN 3/4) in Korea, especially concerning the mitigation capability to remove the decay heat through the steam generators (SGs). From the LSTF simulation, it was found that the RELAP5 code was capable of simulating the plant behavior following the loss-of-RHR event under a shutdown condition. As a result, the thermal-hydraulic transport process including noncondensable gas behavior was reasonably predicted with an appropriate time step and CPU time, and the major thermal-hydraulic phenomena agreed well with the experiment. However, there were some code deficiencies such as an estimation of large system mass errors for the long transient and severe flow oscillations in the core region. These should be improved for more accurate and reliable calculation. In the YGN 3/4 simulation, the water-filled SG case delayed the coolant discharge to containment by ~2 h and the core heatup by ~1.3 h, as compared to the emptied-SG case, because of reduction of the pressurization rate that resulted from condensation on the SG U-tube wall. For the water-filled SGs, the amount of heat transfer into the secondary side was estimated at more than 60% of the total core power throughout the transient.