ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
D. P. Hines, S. Oldberg, E. L. Zebroski
Nuclear Technology | Volume 9 | Number 3 | September 1970 | Pages 338-345
Fuel Element Performance Model | Symposium on Theoretical Models for Predicting In-Reactor Performance of Fuel and Cladding Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT70-A28788
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The steady-state theory of fuel pin swelling in which the majority of fuel pin diametral increase is ascribed to the effects of solid and gaseous fission product swelling of the fuel is in apparent conflict with a body of data relating to oxide fuel pins. The non steady-state or ratchetting theory holds that fuel-cladding mechanical interaction occurs by thermal expansion interaction of the fuel and cladding during reactor temperature or power changes. The primary rate determining mechanism is considered to be something other than the steady-fuel swelling rate. Examples of non-steady-state mechanisms, which experimental evidence suggests may be important, include fuel clad interference occurring during the first startup of the fuel pin, the buildup of porosity in the fuel due to a cracking and healing process, mass transport of fuel from the inside to the outside of the fuel column, and fuel clad interference occurring during reactor shutdown and subsequent removal of the pin from the reactor.