ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
J. A. Baran, R. S. Reynolds, R. E. Faw, W. R. Kimel
Nuclear Technology | Volume 9 | Number 4 | October 1970 | Pages 591-604
Analysis | doi.org/10.13182/NT70-A28769
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method of calibrating a lead-collimated, sodium iodide scintillation spectrometer is reported. Nine radioisotopes with gamma-ray energies in the range from 0.046 to 1.114 MeV were used. Details of the methods of data acquisition and reduction are presented. Methods are described for using response functions from the nine radioisotopes to generate response matrices for the energy range from 20 to 1200 keV. Techniques for unfolding experimental data using response matrices are compared, and a detailed error analysis is presented. For the routine analysis of experimental data using direct matrix inversion, a 25 × 25 response matrix with unequally spaced energy intervals over the range 20 to 1200 keV was found to be near optimum.