ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
C. A. Flanagan
Nuclear Technology | Volume 9 | Number 5 | November 1970 | Pages 640-650
Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT70-A28738
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The physics performance of Shippingport Core 2 operations from initial start-up of the first seed through initial power operations on the second seed is summarized. The emphasis is on comparison of observed results with calculated results to identify the ability of current calculational techniques to describe core operations. Also included are selected comparisons of results of isotopic examination programs performed on Core 1 seed and blanket fuel assemblies. The comparisons indicate that critical core configurations are described with varying degrees of success with reactivity deviations generally <1% δ p. Power distributions agree reasonably well with measured values. Results of destructive analysis programs indicate that both gross and local fuel depletion are calculated to within 5 to 10%.