ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
Harold E. Clark, Grover Tuck
Nuclear Technology | Volume 9 | Number 6 | December 1970 | Pages 814-820
Chemical Processing | doi.org/10.13182/NT70-A28713
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An empirical formula has been developed for determining the individual diameter of essentially unreflected cylinders in a critical planar array. The formula is. The independent variables are N, the number of cylinders in the array; S, the edge-to-edge spacing between adjacent cylinders; H, the solution height in the array; C, the concentration of the solution [U ∼93 wt% 235U]; G, the geometry factor determined by the shape of the array; and ki (i = 1, 2, ... , 8), the constants determined by the type of solution, either uranyl nitrate or uranyl fluoride. These independent variables, the formula ranges, and approximations are discussed. The critical cylinder diameter, calculated by this formula, is within ±8% of the experimentally measured diameter for 112 experimental data points. Therefore, the formula can be used as a guideline for nuclear criticality safety.