ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
H. O. Schad, A. A. Bishop
Nuclear Technology | Volume 8 | Number 3 | March 1970 | Pages 261-275
Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT70-A28673
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experiments were conducted to determine the behavior of stationary gas bubbles in narrow liquid-filled gaps. The work was carried out to help answer the question of how fission gas bubbles may behave in the sodium bond of oxide and carbide fueled rods. The hydraulic data obtained with uncracked pellets indicate that stagnant bubbles may exist even when the simulated fuel rod was vibrated. These stagnant bubbles are large enough to cause calculated hot spots in the bond. The location under an overhanging ledge formed by axial eccentric pellets was a common place for bubbles to stagnate. Possible differences between the actual fuel-rod behavior in the reactor and the test conditions may be caused by heating effects which influence bubble motion, cracked pellets which prevent accumulation of fission gas in the bonding, and the release of significant amounts of fission gas only when the reactor is shut down. Equations are presented for the maximum bubble size, and the length and width of bubbles stagnated at the lips (overhang) of fuel pellets.