ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
B. W. McGhee, W. W. Graham, III, M. R. Haroon
Nuclear Technology | Volume 8 | Number 6 | June 1970 | Pages 531-535
Education | doi.org/10.13182/NT70-A28653
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The increasing availability of high-strength 252Cf neutron sources for educational use suggests the possibility of a new wave of source-strength measurements in student laboratories. In this paper, different methods for calculation and measurement of strengths have been discussed. Results obtained by the maganese-boron method have been compared with the theoretical predictions. Sources of error have been pointed out and a procedure has been recommended for use in a laboratory. It is concluded that results obtained by this method are accurate to 5% while more elaborate and painstaking measurements may produce ∼2% accuracy.