ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
J. Darvas, U. Hansen, E. Teuchert
Nuclear Technology | Volume 8 | Number 6 | June 1970 | Pages 496-506
Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT70-A28649
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The use of Pu as a makeup fuel in D2O-moderated thorium converters is investigated. The reactor starts with plutonium, the bred 233U is reprocessed and fed back into the system. During reactor life there is a considerable change in fissile composition. The physics calculations follow the reactor through the whole running in period from the first core into a quasi-equilibrium state. For this type of system, the running in period makes an important contribution to the overall merits of the reactor. The physics of the Pu burner is compared in detail to a similar reactor using 235U as makeup fuel. The evaluation of fuel-cycle costs is performed with present worth methods, calculating quasi-equilibrium costs and average fuel-cycle costs for the reactor lifetime, running in period included. Thorium systems, starting and running with plutonium makeup, have to pay rather high penalties for the first refueling periods. The Pu value is estimated to be in the range of $9/g fissile.