ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
$40M investment to spur new nuclear developments in Idaho and Wyoming
On Monday, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced that its Economic Development Administration (EDA) intends to award $31 million to the Intermountain-West Nuclear Energy Corridor (INEC) Tech Hub. The Idaho Advanced Energy Consortium (IAEC), the group that leads the INEC Tech Hub, subsequently announced that matching donations from its stakeholder partners will bring the total investment up to $40 million.
N. D. Dudey, Robert R. Heinrich, J. Williams, Allen A. Madson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 7 | Number 1 | July 1969 | Pages 35-43
Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT69-A28383
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Production rates (atoms/gram megawatt day) of 58Co, 54Mn, 55Fe, 63Ni, and 60Co in the Experimental Breeder Reactor-II (EBR-II) irradiated stainless steel are reported. These rates can be used as precise flux and fluence monitors in fast reactors when appropriate spectrum-averaged cross sections are applied. Seven spectrum-averaged cross sections for the core and four spectrum-averaged cross sections at eight radial positions in EBR-II are also reported. The ratio of 54Mn/55Fe atoms produced from 54Fe represents a sensitive spectral hardness indicator for fast-reactor spectra. This study also indicates that in EBR-II the flux per megawatt measured at high power is the same as that measured at low power by other authors. Results show that a diffusion theory calculation provides a reasonably accurate representation of the flux in the core of EBR-II but overestimates the flux in the blanket region.