ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
R. Böhme, H. Seufert
Nuclear Technology | Volume 7 | Number 6 | December 1969 | Pages 494-504
Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT69-A28368
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An absolute determination of uranium reaction rates by means of foil irradiation was carried out in the Fast Zero Power Reactor SNEAK, assembly 3A-2 This requires the measurement of reactionrate traverses as well as their fine structure. These rate distributions were compared with transport and diffusion calculations. The traverse measurements indicate a strong dependence of the axial “buckling” (relative second derivative of the rates) on energy. The calculations with the Karlsruhe SNEAK cross-section set and the Russian ABN set yield these bucklings for 238U capture and 235U fission in diffusion approximation on the average 5% higher than measured. Only the fast-fission rate distribution of 238U is almost correctly calculated using the cross-section sets. The ratio of total plutonium production to 235u fission along the z axis was measured and compared with theory. It agrees within the error limits of the experiment. Beyond the error limits are the discrepancies found for the spectral index σƒ28/σƒ25 The fine structure of reaction rates within the fuel platelets is well described by an integral transport code, but again, there are considerable discrepancies between calculated and measured fission-rate ratios.