ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Launching into tomorrow: NRIC guides new era of research and deployment
In June 2025, the Department of Energy announced the Reactor Pilot Program, an authorization pathway that allowed reactor developers to partner with the DOE to get first-of-a-kind (FOAK) reactors built and tested. Soon after, the DOE rolled out a complementary Fuel Line Pilot Program, which aimed to fast-track fuel projects. In all, 20 projects were accepted into the new programs.
H. B. Rosenthal, E. A. Szymkowiak, C. H. George
Nuclear Technology | Volume 6 | Number 3 | March 1969 | Pages 191-198
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT69-A28305
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An experiment was performed to study the dynamic control of a reactor by hydrogen transport and to demonstrate its load-following capabilities. The system is based on the mass transport of hydrogen between two ZrHX beds—one UO2 fueled, the other unfueled. The in-core hydrogen concentration controls the reactivity, and the resulting changes in reactor flux control the heat input into the in-core UO2-fueled bed. In turn, the in-core hydrogen concentration is controlled by changes in temperature differences between the in-core and out-of-core beds. Within analytical design constraints set by experimental and safety requirements, calculated ranges of parameters established design specifications. Preliminary validation measurements included reactor stability and temperature coefficient, experimental system stability and temperature coefficient, and in-core hydrogen worth. Comparison showed that hydrogen mass transport contributed 73% of the effectiveness of hydrogen reactivity control while temperature contributed only 27%. All experimental transient responses to step changes in thermal load exhibited analytically predicted damped oscillatory behavior. Reactor startup, shutdown, and response to reactivity changes were demonstrated. This experiment verified that hydrogen reactivity control, a mechanically passive device, is an effective, self-regulating mechanism for controlling a nuclear reactor.