ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
H. B. Rosenthal, E. A. Szymkowiak, C. H. George
Nuclear Technology | Volume 6 | Number 3 | March 1969 | Pages 191-198
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT69-A28305
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An experiment was performed to study the dynamic control of a reactor by hydrogen transport and to demonstrate its load-following capabilities. The system is based on the mass transport of hydrogen between two ZrHX beds—one UO2 fueled, the other unfueled. The in-core hydrogen concentration controls the reactivity, and the resulting changes in reactor flux control the heat input into the in-core UO2-fueled bed. In turn, the in-core hydrogen concentration is controlled by changes in temperature differences between the in-core and out-of-core beds. Within analytical design constraints set by experimental and safety requirements, calculated ranges of parameters established design specifications. Preliminary validation measurements included reactor stability and temperature coefficient, experimental system stability and temperature coefficient, and in-core hydrogen worth. Comparison showed that hydrogen mass transport contributed 73% of the effectiveness of hydrogen reactivity control while temperature contributed only 27%. All experimental transient responses to step changes in thermal load exhibited analytically predicted damped oscillatory behavior. Reactor startup, shutdown, and response to reactivity changes were demonstrated. This experiment verified that hydrogen reactivity control, a mechanically passive device, is an effective, self-regulating mechanism for controlling a nuclear reactor.