ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
R. T. Allen, R. E. Duff
Nuclear Technology | Volume 6 | Number 6 | June 1969 | Pages 567-572
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT69-A28286
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Finite difference techniques for the solution of the motion of an elastic-plastic solid are used to investigate the effect of rock strength and the cavity gas properties on the cavity size formed by a nuclear explosion. The material description includes the effect of pressure and temperature on the yield surface and the change of material description in the solid, liquid, and vapor phases. The results presented indicate a strong dependence of cavity size on the rock strength and a considerably lower sensitivity to the ideal gas coefficient, γ, assumed for the cavity gas. The results suggest that the cavity sizes observed in nuclear field tests can be better correlated with calculations by assuming strength parameters considerably lower than observed in laboratory tests on competent rock samples.