ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Nuclear EOs: One year later
This Saturday, May 23, will mark one year since President Trump issued four executive orders (EOs) that sought to implement sweeping changes across the U.S. nuclear industry. From regulatory reform at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to new authorization projects at the Departments of Energy and Defense, the orders sent ripples throughout the industry.
George Houghton, Clyde Jupiter, Gerald Trimble, David Spielberg, Paul G. Klann, Water A. Paulson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 6 | Number 1 | January 1969 | Pages 81-92
Technical Papers and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT69-A28271
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The absolute gamma dose was measured at 60 locations within the Tungsten Water-Moderated Reactor critical assembly. The neutron dose was measured at 30 locations. Graphite wall thimble ionization chambers filled with carbon dioxide were used for gamma measurements and polyethylene wall chambers filled with ethylene were used for mixed gamma and neutron fluxes. The chambers were absolutely calibrated in a bremsstrahlung beam against a secondary calibration standard and in a reactor against a water-filled calorimeter. These calibrations were used to determine the absolute gamma and neutron responses for the chambers; this permitted partitioning the measured mixed radiation dose into a neutron dose. The measured gamma doses were compared with an ATHENA Monte Carlo calculation. Good agreement was found for the 16 locations compared. The average deviation was 10%. In addition, the measured neutron doses were compared with a first-collision calculation of the dose. The calculated neutron doses were uniformly low with an average deviation from the measurement of 18%.