ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
J. Kuypers, J. P. Ruiter
Nuclear Technology | Volume 5 | Number 5 | November 1968 | Pages 354-361
Technical Papers and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT68-A28003
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The leaktightness of a number of vessels was determined at subatmospheric pressure. For structural reasons, the maximum allowable pressure difference between the contained volume and the atmosphere was limited to 0.2 kg/cm2. Inleakage was determined by measuring the oxygen contained in the inleaking air. The oxygen initially present in the vessels was removed in advance by catalytic combination with hydrogen. With this method, the change in the oxygen partial pressure is more perceptible than a change in the absolute pressure. Additionally, a homogeneous temperature distribution inside the vessel is not required. The oxygen partial pressure was measured by an electrochemical cell. A leakage rate of 1.1 ± 0.2 liters/h into a contained volume of 152 m3 (i.e., <0.02%/day) was determined within 41 h after the oxygen was removed. Although the method is accurate and fast and can be used for a reactor containment, even with the reactor in operation, it is applicable only to leakage rate measurements at subatmospheric pressures. It must be pointed out that a leak at subatmospheric pressure may behave quite differently when the internal pressure is greater than the external.