ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
S. R. Smith
Nuclear Technology | Volume 5 | Number 1 | July 1968 | Pages 20-23
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT68-A27980
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the Purex process used at the Savannah River Plant, the suppression of the release of radioiodine by complexing it with mercury was tested. Suppressing radioiodine release would be desirable if short-cooled fuel were inadvertently charged to the dissolver in the plant. When irradiated uranium reactor fuels are processed, radioiodine is normally evolved during dissolution with HNO3, clarification, subsequent solvent extraction, and waste evaporation. Normally (without mercury), ∼ 50% of the radioiodine is evolved from the dissolver solution and efficiently sorbed in a silver nitrate bed, but the small amount evolved from the remainder of the process is released to the atmosphere through tall stacks. This release is suppressed by adding mercuric nitrate to the dissolver solution. With 0.04M Hg2+ in the dissolver solution and a gelatin clarifier, the radioiodine atmospheric release was reduced 55-fold. A material balance indicated that the mercury-iodine complex remained in the organic solvent where it was slowly removed by solvent scrubbers and subsequently transferred to a seepage basin. In another test, the presence of 5 × 10−4 M Hg2+ in the dissolver and the use of a MnO2 clarifier reduced 131I atmospheric releases a total of 22-fold. In tests without Hg2+, MnO2 clarification reduced 131I atmospheric releases 2.5-fold over the normal gelatin clarification. Mercurous nitrate (4 × 10−4M) was not more effective than mercuric nitrate (5 × 10−4M) in suppressing 131I evolution.