ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
A. A. Chilenskas
Nuclear Technology | Volume 5 | Number 1 | July 1968 | Pages 11-19
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT68-A27979
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In five laboratory-scale experiments in which irradiated UO2 reactor fuel was processed in a fluidized bed, high removals of uranium and plutonium were achieved by oxidizing with O2, fluorinating with BrF5 to convert uranium to volatile UF6, then fluorinating with F2 to convert plutonium to volatile PuF6. The principal activities volatilized during the oxidation step were ∼ 27% of the krypton and ∼ 3.5% of the ruthenium. During the uranium separation step, >99.5% of the uranium and <0.5% of the plutonium volatilized with ∼ 60% of the ruthenium, ∼ 67% of the krypton, ∼76% of the molybdenum, and ∼2.7% of the antimony. During the F2 step, the principal activities that volatilized concurrently with the plutonium were ∼ 38% of the molybdenum, ∼8% of the ruthenium, ∼ 0.2% of the zirconium, ∼ 5.8% of the niobium, ∼ 1% of the antimony, and ∼ 5% of the krypton. Analyses for tellurium, technetium, and neptunium, which are other possible contaminants in the uranium and plutonium stream, were not completed.