ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
CLEAN SMART bill reintroduced in Senate
Senators Ben Ray Luján (D., N.M.) and Tim Scott (R., S.C.) have reintroduced legislation aimed at leveraging the best available science and technology at U.S. national laboratories to support the cleanup of legacy nuclear waste.
The Combining Laboratory Expertise to Accelerate Novel Solutions for Minimizing Accumulated Radioactive Toxins (CLEAN SMART) Act, introduced on February 11, would authorize up to $58 million annually to develop, demonstrate, and deploy innovative technologies, targeting reduced costs and safer, faster remediation of sites from the Manhattan Project and Cold War.
A. A. Chilenskas
Nuclear Technology | Volume 5 | Number 1 | July 1968 | Pages 11-19
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT68-A27979
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In five laboratory-scale experiments in which irradiated UO2 reactor fuel was processed in a fluidized bed, high removals of uranium and plutonium were achieved by oxidizing with O2, fluorinating with BrF5 to convert uranium to volatile UF6, then fluorinating with F2 to convert plutonium to volatile PuF6. The principal activities volatilized during the oxidation step were ∼ 27% of the krypton and ∼ 3.5% of the ruthenium. During the uranium separation step, >99.5% of the uranium and <0.5% of the plutonium volatilized with ∼ 60% of the ruthenium, ∼ 67% of the krypton, ∼76% of the molybdenum, and ∼2.7% of the antimony. During the F2 step, the principal activities that volatilized concurrently with the plutonium were ∼ 38% of the molybdenum, ∼8% of the ruthenium, ∼ 0.2% of the zirconium, ∼ 5.8% of the niobium, ∼ 1% of the antimony, and ∼ 5% of the krypton. Analyses for tellurium, technetium, and neptunium, which are other possible contaminants in the uranium and plutonium stream, were not completed.