ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
Alex Volborth, H. A. Vincent
Nuclear Technology | Volume 3 | Number 11 | November 1967 | Pages 701-707
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT67-A27907
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Oxygen is determined by irradiating powdered rock samples with 14-MeV neutrons in a dual-transfer system and counting the 6.1- and 7.1-MeV gammas of 16N and their escape peaks. Corrections for beam instability, tritium target decay and spottiness, and electronic drift are made by consecutively switching samples to be irradiated and counted at opposite stations. Corrections must be made for the fluorine content of rocks. Reagent chemicals can be used as standards. The method is very precise, and interferences in the high-energy gamma region are undetectable. Two sets of data are given: uncorrected random results, with statistical evaluation of the precision of the method, and recommended results obtained from reanalyzing samples that showed standard deviations of 0.25% oxygen. Analysis of variance for rock samples shows that the USGS standards can be considered homogeneous for oxygen by this technique.