ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
P. E. Gethard, L. R. Zumwalt
Nuclear Technology | Volume 3 | Number 11 | November 1967 | Pages 679-685
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT67-A27903
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The diffusion of strontium and cesium through thin layers (100 μm) of isotropic pyrolytic carbon has been measured over the temperature range 1000 to 1700°C. Diffusion coefficients observed for cesium are orders of magnitude lower than those for strontium. The diffusion rates for both series are much lower than those observed in porous poly crystalline graphite, where little difference is seen between cesium and strontium. When constant chemical potential sources are used, chemical- and self-diffusion measurements for strontium give identical results in the Sr concentration range 0.01 to 0.2 wt%. There is apparently no concentration effect for cesium over the range 1.0 × 10−5 to 0.15 wt%. The difference between strontium and cesium diffusion in pyrolytic carbon is attributed to the greater steric effect of the pyrolytic-carbon defect structure relative to cesium.