ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
CLEAN SMART bill reintroduced in Senate
Senators Ben Ray Luján (D., N.M.) and Tim Scott (R., S.C.) have reintroduced legislation aimed at leveraging the best available science and technology at U.S. national laboratories to support the cleanup of legacy nuclear waste.
The Combining Laboratory Expertise to Accelerate Novel Solutions for Minimizing Accumulated Radioactive Toxins (CLEAN SMART) Act, introduced on February 11, would authorize up to $58 million annually to develop, demonstrate, and deploy innovative technologies, targeting reduced costs and safer, faster remediation of sites from the Manhattan Project and Cold War.
P. E. Gethard, L. R. Zumwalt
Nuclear Technology | Volume 3 | Number 11 | November 1967 | Pages 679-685
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT67-A27903
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The diffusion of strontium and cesium through thin layers (100 μm) of isotropic pyrolytic carbon has been measured over the temperature range 1000 to 1700°C. Diffusion coefficients observed for cesium are orders of magnitude lower than those for strontium. The diffusion rates for both series are much lower than those observed in porous poly crystalline graphite, where little difference is seen between cesium and strontium. When constant chemical potential sources are used, chemical- and self-diffusion measurements for strontium give identical results in the Sr concentration range 0.01 to 0.2 wt%. There is apparently no concentration effect for cesium over the range 1.0 × 10−5 to 0.15 wt%. The difference between strontium and cesium diffusion in pyrolytic carbon is attributed to the greater steric effect of the pyrolytic-carbon defect structure relative to cesium.