ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
E. Schonfeld, A. H. Kibbey
Nuclear Technology | Volume 3 | Number 6 | June 1967 | Pages 353-359
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT67-A27857
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Controlled reflux was studied as a method for improving the efficiency of removing strontium from solution by foam separation. Tests were performed with solutions containing 85S, 10−6 M Sr2+ carrier, and 90 to 100 ppm of the surfactant sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (NaDBS) in either distilled water or 0.005 M NaOH to 0.005 M Na2CO3 solution. Nearly constant feed rates were maintained at about 40 gal/ft2 of column cross section per hour. With these conditions, the volume reduction factor was increased to 3700 (from a value of ≈ 30 for nonrefluxing systems) and the strontium decontamination factor was in excess of 103. In general, the volume reduction was inversely proportional to the gas/liquid volume ratio but directly proportional to the percent of foam reflux; the strontium decontamination factor, however, did not change very much within the throughput range studied.