ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Launching into tomorrow: NRIC guides new era of research and deployment
In June 2025, the Department of Energy announced the Reactor Pilot Program, an authorization pathway that allowed reactor developers to partner with the DOE to get first-of-a-kind (FOAK) reactors built and tested. Soon after, the DOE rolled out a complementary Fuel Line Pilot Program, which aimed to fast-track fuel projects. In all, 20 projects were accepted into the new programs.
J. H. DeVan, C. E. Sessions
Nuclear Technology | Volume 3 | Number 2 | February 1967 | Pages 102-109
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT67-A27807
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Mass transfer rates of Nb-1%Zr and D-43 (Nb-10%W-1%Zr-0.1%C) in high-temperature lithium were determined in thermal convection loops of each alloy. The loops circulated lithium for 3000h at a 1200°C maximum temperature and a 100 to 150°C ΔT. Weight change data were obtained from 58 insert specimens placed end-to-end around each loop. The oxygen content of both alloys decreased during test. Zirconium and nitrogen were transferred by the lithium from the higher-temperature to the lower-temperature loop surfaces. The extent of this mass transfer was greater in the Nb-1%Zr test and resulted in a light zirconium-nitride mass transfer deposit on the cold-leg surfaces of this alloy. Specimens at equivalent temperatures in the heater and cooler regions showed the same weight change indicating no appreciable downstream effect due to concentration changes in the lithium. Given the same absolute concentration driving force, the rate of deposition was measurably greater than the rate of dissolution; accordingly, dissolution occurred over two-thirds of the loop surfaces and deposition over the remaining one-third. An analysis of the mass transfer results for these two loops based on the assumption of a simple dissolution model showed the change in solute concentration of the lithium around the loop to be only a few parts per billion.