ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
K. Lassmann
Nuclear Technology | Volume 40 | Number 3 | October 1978 | Pages 321-328
Technical Paper | Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT78-A26730
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The state-of-the-art in fuel rod structural analysis is discussed, and possible future developments in this field are outlined. The conclusion is drawn that the most important goal for future research is a deeper understanding of material behavior. It is suggested that a strategy of successive use of diverse models appropriate to the varying degrees of theoretical sophistication be followed in fuel rod structural analysis: Preliminary work should be an analysis of the integral fuel rod with one-dimensional models, followed by local two-dimensional analyses. Finally, the deterministic analyses should be augmented by probabilistic work. All these modeling approaches are inevitably complementary in exhaustive fuel rod analysis, but they are, despite the tremendous theoretical efforts, no substitute for fuel rod performance tests. Nevertheless, analytical modeling will remain an indispensable tool for a long time to come, since with this theoretical background, the interpretation of experimental results is facilitated, and a better insight into fuel rod behavior is provided.