ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
P. Greebler, B. A. Hutchins, R. B. Linford
Nuclear Technology | Volume 4 | Number 5 | May 1968 | Pages 297-306
Technical Paper and Note | doi.org/10.13182/NT68-A26395
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The uncertainties in physics parameters and in fuel cost of fast power reactors due to current nuclear data uncertainties are considered for two sodium-cooled, oxide-fueled, 1000 MW(e) reactors. One reactor has a low core neutron leakage and a core composition that results in very low fuel cost and short doubling time for fissile material. The second reactor is forced to satisfy stringent safety criteria associated with the sodium voiding reactivity problem and, hence, has a high core neutron leakage and a large amount of moderating material (BeO) in its core composition, with resultant higher fuel cost. Ranges in uncertainties in fuel cost and doubling time for each recognized significant data uncertainty over a “correlated” energy interval are evaluated for each of the two reactors, using the highest and the lowest reasonable values of that nuclear data parameter, as well as the values recommended in the Brookhaven Evaluated Nuclear Data Files (ENDF/B). Combined uncertainties in data produce an uncertainty of ∼0.15 mill/kWh in fuel cost for the low leakage reactor and 0.25 mill/kWh for the reactor for which the design composition (BeO content) must be adjusted as the nuclear data are varied, in order to satisfy the stringent sodium voiding safety criteria. The current large uncertainty in the value of α for 239Pu below 15 keV is the largest single contributor to this overall fuel cost uncertainty, closely followed by the uncertainties in for 239Pu and σc(σc = σn,y) for 238U. On the basis of the calculated sensitivity of fuel cost to specific data uncertainties, a set of targets for nuclear data accuracy that would reduce the calculated fuel cost uncertainty to about ±0.03 mill/kWh is recommended.