ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
J. A. Vitti, P. K. Doherty, G. F. di Lauro, J. C. Gilbertson, D. W. Stuteville
Nuclear Technology | Volume 26 | Number 4 | August 1975 | Pages 442-451
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT75-A24444
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A preliminary assessment of proof testing 13 prototypical liquid-metal fast breeder reactor (LMFBR) carbide fuel assemblies in fast test reactor (FTR) driver positions leads to the conclusion that the testing plan is practical and should produce a large amount of data at operating conditions very similar to those that would be found in large commercial carbide-fueled LMFBR s. Three subassembly configurations were designed, each capable of being directly substituted into FTR driver positions and made compatible with the FTR geometry, fuel handling, power, temperature, subassembly flow rates, and pin-bundle pressure drop. Two sodium-bonded designs, one with 91 fuel pins with a 0.370-in. o.d. and the other with 127 fuel pins with a 0.315-in. o.d. per subassembly were established. Calculated peak linear power and peak discharge burnup slightly exceed present commercial design objectives of 30 kW/ft and 73 MWd/kg. Individual assembly power history, flux, and enrichments are represented quite well in the FTR for commercial outer-zone fuel assemblies. Inner-zone operating conditions, however, are not simulated as closely. Impact effects of the proof-test assemblies on FTR operation are judged to be manageable.