ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
Robert E. Rothe, Donald L. Alvarez, Harold E. Clark
Nuclear Technology | Volume 25 | Number 3 | March 1975 | Pages 502-516
Technical Paper | Chemical Processing | doi.org/10.13182/NT75-A24388
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Nuclear safety engineers must evaluate the criticality potential of a variety of plant problems. Many of these involve an essentially unreflected system containing uranium solution and a fixed nuclear poison. Measured critical parameters for such a system at solution concentrations of 52.2- and 141.5-g U/liter, together with those reported previously at 450.8-g U/liter, provide the engineer information over a wide range of concentrations normally encountered in industrial applications. The uranium was enriched to 93.24 wt% 235U. The fixed poison was 1.02 wt% natural boron alloyed in stainless-steel plates. Critical solution heights were measured for various numbers of nearly uniformly spaced vertical plates within the 106.6-cm-diam experimental tank. The simplest cases studied involved no poison, resulting in low critical heights. As plates were added, the critical height increased until a sufficient number were present that even an infinitely tall tank would have been subcritical. The actual finite plate height permitted a third type of experimental result: the critical parameters of an unpoisoned uranium solution slab on top of a highly poisoned solution region. Experimental data at all three concentrations compared with results from Monte Carlo and neutron transport computer codes are found to predict critical heights consistently in excess of measured values. A nuclear safety engineer may safely apply these calculational methods to similar plant situations provided an ∼20% reduction in either the solution height or plate spacing— whichever is appropriate—is made to account for the theory/experiment difference. Boron-containing plates are compared with borosilicate glass Raschig rings as fixed nuclear poisons for large-volume solution storage. Neither is clearly superior to the other considering the poison volume percent required for criticality. Nuclear safety engineers may safely apply these experimental poison plate data to standard ringpoisoned systems involving a high-concentration uranium solution provided a 2% increase in the boron density is made to account for uncertainties in the comparison.