ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
GAO report describes cleanup progress at Moab Mill Site
A new report released by the U.S. Government Accountability Office states that the Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management (EM) has disposed of more than 16 million tons of radioactive and hazardous waste from the Moab Mill Site. While cleanup continues at the Cold War–era uranium ore processing site in southeastern Utah, a plan for the next phase of groundwater remediation is still needed, according to the GAO.
R. C. Greenwood, R. G. Helmer, J W Rogers, N. D. Dudey, R. J. Popek, L. S. Kellogg, W. H. Zimmer
Nuclear Technology | Volume 25 | Number 2 | February 1975 | Pages 274-288
Technical Paper | Material Dosimetry | doi.org/10.13182/NT75-A24368
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Foils of various nonfissile materials commonly utilized in neutron dosimetry were irradiated in the Coupled Fast Reactivity Measurement Facility and quantitatively gamma counted by five groups at four laboratories. Each laboratory used an independently calibrated Ge(Li) detector, and in some cases an NaI(Tl) detector also. These measurements were undertaken as a part of the Interlaboratory LMFBR Reaction Rate (ILRR) program. A primary goal of this initial set of measurements made under the ILRR program was to intercompare the reaction rates determined by the participating groups. The reaction rate values determined by the five groups were all in excellent agreement, generally consistent to within ±2% with respect to each other. Based upon this consistency and the quoted measurement errors, we would estimate that for most nonfissile dosimetry foils, where the nuclear data are adequate, reaction rates can be determined with an accuracy of ∼±2% (standard deviation uncertainty) using these techniques. This accuracy then easily surpasses the accuracy goal of ±5% (1σ uncertainty) of the ILRR program for nonfissile dosimetry foils. These reaction rates are of sufficient accuracy to be used to test and evaluate energy-dependent cross-section sets currently being evaluated in ENDF/B.