ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
C. L. Schuske, D. Dickinson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 25 | Number 1 | January 1975 | Pages 72-82
Technical Paper | Chemical Processing | doi.org/10.13182/NT75-A24350
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experimental criticality measurements have been made on assemblies of plutonium metal to design a crucible that can safely melt up to 12 kg of plutonium. In addition, in situ experiments on two prototype crucibles and furnace setups confirmed the 12-kg capacity. These crucible designs were responsible for a considerable savings in initial capital and operating expense for a new plant. A comparison of Monte Carlo calculations and experimental measurements indicated that the calculational method is sufficiently accurate to be used in future crucible designs, rather than a series of critical mass measurements. The cost for a calculational study is less than 2% of the cost of an experimental study.