ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
X-energy raises $700M in latest funding round
Advanced reactor developer X-energy has announced that it has closed an oversubscribed Series D financing round of approximately $700 million. The funding proceeds are expected to be used to help continue the expansion of its supply chain and the commercial pipeline for its Xe-100 advanced small modular reactor and TRISO-X fuel, according the company.
John R. Banister, D. M. Ellett
Nuclear Technology | Volume 27 | Number 4 | December 1975 | Pages 660-679
Technical Paper | Nuclear Explosive | doi.org/10.13182/NT75-A24340
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Measurements were made of the change of in situ pore pressures and the associated accelerations in the saturated clayey silts (ML) of Fawn Creek and Black Sulphur Valleys at 2.1, 4, 7, and 10 km from surface zero. The early pore pressure changes correlated well with accelerations while the later values correlated better with velocities. The pressure changes ranged from 17.1 to 0.36 psi far the peak pressures and from 1.7 to 0.10 psi for the average pressure increases 10 sec after the detonation. Pretest estimates indicated that liquefaction was considered probable but it was not observed and the pore pressure increases were one-quarter or less than those associated with this phenomenon.