ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
William T. Sha
Nuclear Technology | Volume 1 | Number 6 | December 1965 | Pages 538-545
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NT65-A20580
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effective resonance temperature (Teff) correlation of UO2 pellets based on experimental power coefficient data from PWR cores, namely, YANKEE, SAXTON, BR-3, and SELNI, is presented. The correlation can predict the total power defect of reactivity from hot zero power to full power within experimental uncertainties and Teff at any power level within ± 80°F (± 45°C), a magnitude which constitutes no more than ± 6% of the value at full power for current PWR design. With the ± 80°F uncertainty in Teff, the magnitude of the power coefficient of reactivity can vary as much as ± 30% in the low power region and ± 20% in the high power region. This study indicates the temperature drop in the gap between the pellet and clad is much lower than the value calculated for it in the past.