ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
J. R. Flanary, J. H. Goode, M. J. Bradley, L. M. Ferris, J. W. Ullmann, G. C. Wall
Nuclear Technology | Volume 1 | Number 3 | June 1965 | Pages 219-224
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NT65-A20505
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Three head-end processes that culminate in decontamination and recovery of uranium and plutonium by solvent extraction were evaluated on a laboratory scale, with unirradiated UC and with UC and UC-PuC fuel specimens irradiated to burnups of up to 20 000 MWd/t. The most promising process was reaction with air-free steam (pyrohydrolysis) at 750°C followed by dissolution of the resulting oxide (UO2 or UO2-PuO2) in nitric acid. Cesium was the principal fission product volatilized, but the amount was very low (about 0.5%). The oxide and fission products were dissolved in 6.5 M HNO3, yielding solutions suitable as feeds for Purex solvent extraction. Uranium and plutonium recoveries were greater than 99.9% in batch extraction tests, being separated from fission products by a factor of at least 104. An alternative but less desirable process was direct dissolution in 13 M HNO3 followed by partial oxidation with acid permanganate of the soluble organic species formed. Plutonium losses of up to 0.4% occurred when the uranium and plutonium were stripped with dilute nitric acid after solvent extraction. Reaction of the carbides with water followed by dissolution of the oxides in nitric acid was an attractive process when tested with unirradiated materials, but this scheme is not feasible for irradiated carbides since they are relatively inert to boiling water.