ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
A. C. Hoyle, G. R. Howey
Nuclear Technology | Volume 1 | Number 1 | February 1965 | Pages 25-32
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NT65-A20460
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Two innovations in the design of the NPD primary system were to use carbon steel for piping and to fill and test with heavy water only. Resulting savings were $400 000 and $100 000, respectively. Specifications ensured satisfactory surface and fluid states following commissioning. Operation of the carbon steel system has been very satisfactory except for a fueling-machine failure when foreign materials were introduced into the system. The pD of the system has been maintained between 10 – 11, the dissolved O2 concentration at < 0.01 parts/106 and the crud level during steady-state operation at < 0.01 parts/106 with peak crud concentrations of < 0.1 parts/106. During pressure testing, 496 lbs of reactor grade D2O were lost at a cost of $12 400 at today's prices; nevertheless this loss is acceptably low. Significantly, the corrosion rate, the radiolytic damage, and the gas formation were never as great as had been expected. Carbon steel is therefore recommended for other pressurized water systems. The experience gained in operating NPD for two years showed the economic feasibility of pressurized D2O as a reactor coolant and pointed out the improvements required. Consequently, the target figure of 10 lb/day loss of D2O for a 200-MWe reactor now appears feasible.