ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Ken S. Kozier, Dan Roubtsov, Arjan J. M. Plompen, Stefan Kopecky
Nuclear Technology | Volume 183 | Number 3 | September 2013 | Pages 473-483
Technical Paper | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT13-A19435
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The thermal neutron elastic-scattering cross-section data for 16O used in various modern evaluated nuclear data libraries were reviewed and found to be generally too high compared with the best available experimental measurements. Some of the proposed revisions to the ENDF/B-VII.0 16O data library and recent results from the TENDL system increase this discrepancy further. The reactivity impact of revising the 16O data downward to be consistent with the best measurements was tested using the JENDL-3.3 16O cross-section values and was found to be very small in MCNP5 simulations of the UO2 and reactor-recycle MOX fuel cases of the American Nuclear Society Doppler defect numerical benchmark. However, large reactivity differences of up to [approximately]14 mk (1400 pcm) were observed using 16O data files from several evaluated nuclear data libraries in MCNP5 simulations of the Los Alamos National Laboratory highly enriched uranium (HEU) heavy water solution thermal critical experiments, which were performed in the 1950s. The latter result suggests that new measurements using HEU in a heavy water-moderated critical facility, such as the ZED-2 zero-power reactor at the Chalk River Laboratories, might help to resolve the discrepancy between the 16O thermal elastic-scattering cross-section values and thereby reduce or better define its uncertainty, although additional assessment work would be needed to confirm this.