ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
ANS panel discussion looks at nuclear’s place in maritime, energy, medicine, space
The applications of nuclear energy extend beyond providing power to the electrical grid. Advanced nuclear technologies may soon have new applications in oil and gas facilities, in hospitals and clinics, on the open seas, and on the moon.
A June 1 executive session, “How Nuclear Technologies will Shape the Future Energy Economy,” at the American Nuclear Society’s Annual Conference allowed experts have an open discussion on the future of nuclear advancements in multiple sectors.
B. Allard, G. W. Beall, T. Krajewski+
Nuclear Technology | Volume 49 | Number 3 | August 1980 | Pages 474-480
Technical Paper | Radioactive Waste | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A17695
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The sorption of americium(III) and neptunium(V) on some major minerals of igneous rocks (quartz, microcline, albite, bytownite, biotite, hornblende, augite, olivine, and kaolinite) and on two granites has been studied, the aqueous phase being on artificial groundwater and with pH varying from four to nine. The sorption was measured on crushed solids (0.044 to 0.063 mm) at ambient temperature by a batch technique, using 241 Am (2 × 10−9M) and 235Np (2 × 10−11 M). For both americium and neptunium, sorption isotherms were obtained that seem to be related to the formation of hydrolyzed species of the elements in the aqueous phase, giving an increased sorption with an increase of the degree of hydrolysis (starting at pH 5 for americium and at pH 8 for neptunium). The sorption on the individual minerals seems to be qualitatively related to their specific surfaces (and cation exchange capacities), but the differences between high-sorbing biotite and low-sorbing quartz were not more than one order of magnitude (in terms of distribution coefficients) in the studied pH range. Distribution coefficients for the granites were equal to the weighted average values of the distribution coefficients for the individual minerals within a factor of three.