ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Mirion announces appointments
Mirion Technologies has announced three senior leadership appointments designed to support its global nuclear and medical businesses while advancing a company-wide digital and AI strategy. The leadership changes come as Mirion seeks to advance innovation and maintain strong performance in nuclear energy, radiation safety, and medical applications.
B. Allard, G. W. Beall, T. Krajewski+
Nuclear Technology | Volume 49 | Number 3 | August 1980 | Pages 474-480
Technical Paper | Radioactive Waste | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A17695
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The sorption of americium(III) and neptunium(V) on some major minerals of igneous rocks (quartz, microcline, albite, bytownite, biotite, hornblende, augite, olivine, and kaolinite) and on two granites has been studied, the aqueous phase being on artificial groundwater and with pH varying from four to nine. The sorption was measured on crushed solids (0.044 to 0.063 mm) at ambient temperature by a batch technique, using 241 Am (2 × 10−9M) and 235Np (2 × 10−11 M). For both americium and neptunium, sorption isotherms were obtained that seem to be related to the formation of hydrolyzed species of the elements in the aqueous phase, giving an increased sorption with an increase of the degree of hydrolysis (starting at pH 5 for americium and at pH 8 for neptunium). The sorption on the individual minerals seems to be qualitatively related to their specific surfaces (and cation exchange capacities), but the differences between high-sorbing biotite and low-sorbing quartz were not more than one order of magnitude (in terms of distribution coefficients) in the studied pH range. Distribution coefficients for the granites were equal to the weighted average values of the distribution coefficients for the individual minerals within a factor of three.