ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
Eugene W. Sucov, Chok Ken Liang
Nuclear Technology | Volume 25 | Number 4 | April 1975 | Pages 714-721
Technical Paper | Reactor Siting | doi.org/10.13182/NT75-A16127
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A rating method first identifies and evaluates the influence of various proponents in a, siting controversy and then combines these strength measures into an overall measure of the degree of acceptance of a proposed power plant by the community. The operating strength, OS, of an individual or group relevant to the controversy is defined to be the product of its relative significance, RS, or influence and its value judgment, VJ. That is, OSi = RSi × VJi, where i refers to the specific subject being analyzed. The function VJi can take on positive values (supporting the proposed plant) or negative values (opposing). The balance of forces supporting or opposing the plant is summarized by a single quantity, the total operating strength of the community, The above methodology was applied to a specific recent controversy. Citizen groups were found to be strongly opposed to the proposed plant, as expected, while the occupational groups strongly favored it. Influential individuals were, on balance, only slightly opposed to the project. The general public was strongly accepting of the plant and was decisive in causing the total operating strength of the community, OSTOT, be favorable to the power plant.