ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
Joel E. Haggard
Nuclear Technology | Volume 25 | Number 4 | April 1975 | Pages 607-616
Technical Paper | Reactor Siting | doi.org/10.13182/NT75-A16116
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Timely assurance of power plant site availability is threatened by institutional inabilities to resolve often competing environmental/energy requirements. Institutional changes are needed. The issue of site approval should be separated from that of plant approval. A “one-stop” forum for site approval, modeled after Washington State‘s Thermal Power Plant Siting Act, is needed. The one-stop process utilizes one forum composed of officials drawn from all agencies involved in site related issues. A joint Federal/State Siting Council, with sole jurisdiction over site approval, is recommended. The State Council would have a determinative vote on all issues not otherwise preempted by federal legislation. Comprehensive siting criteria to stabilize the judgmental process would be developed in generic rule-making hearings. In all Siting Council proceedings the public would be represented by a government-retained attorney having access to independent technical consultants. One application would be submitted to the Siting Council. Site Prequalification, by which the site would be deemed “not unacceptable” for further development, would occur early in the planning process. Prequalification would depend on showing conformance with the siting criteria and a need for the power. Prequalification would freeze the site’s zoning, reserve the necessary water, and result in a specification of studies for final certification. One Environmental Impact Statement would be prepared by the Siting Councils. A Final Certification Agreement, embodying all terms and conditions governing site use for plant construction and operation, would be executed. The agreement would be in lieu of any other permit, certificate, or similar document.